This webinar is on-demand and available immediately.

Every stake holder claims dominion over the reconstruction of a violent event (detectives, attorneys, scientists, trier-of-fact), yet most have nothing but common (non)-sense and parochial experience to guide their efforts. What can and should the scientist contribute to an understanding of the aftermath of a violent encounter? What constitutes a ‘scientific’ inquiry into such an occurrence?

Presenter: Keith Inman

Recorded: 12/13/2018