All archived opportunities can be found on Youtube.
![]() |
The legal and scientific communities agree that any forensic method or algorithm should undergo validation testing before it is relied upon in the judicial system to make life-altering decisions. This webinar is available on YouTube. |
![]() |
This webinar details the development, capabilities and successful deployment of the Modeling And iNventory of Tread Impression System (MANTIS). This webinar is available on YouTube. |
![]() |
Forensic examiners compare items to assess whether they originate from a common source. This webinar is available on YouTube. |
![]() |
This study was conducted to assess the accuracy and reproducibility of BPA conclusions. This webinar is available on YouTube. |
![]() |
Over the past decade, with increasing scientific scrutiny on forensic reporting practices, there have been several efforts to introduce statistical thinking and probabilistic reasoning into forensic practice. This webinar is available on YouTube. |
![]() |
Over the years, scientific and legal scholars have called for the implementation of algorithms (e.g., statistical methods) in forensic science to provide an empirical foundation to experts’ subjective conclusions. This webinar is available on YouTube. |
![]() |
To date, digital forensics research has largely focused on extracting and reconstructing information from devices and the cloud. This webinar is available on YouTube. |
![]() |
In this webinar, Amanda Luby explored how Item Response Theory (IRT), a class of statistical methods used prominently in educational testing, can be used to measure participant proficiency in error rate studies. This webinar is available on YouTube. |
![]() |
Over a decade has passed since The National Academy of Forensic Science’s report, Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward, called on the scientific community to examine the scientific foundations and limitations of various forensic disciplines. This symposium is available on YouTube. |
![]() |
Forensic handwriting analysis relies on the principle of individuality: no two writers produce identical writing, and given enough quality and quantity of writing, it is possible to infer whether two documents were written by the same person. This webinar is available on YouTube. |