Skip to content

All Learning Opportunities

A Survey of Fingerprint Examiners’ Attitudes towards Probabilistic Reporting

Over the past decade, with increasing scientific scrutiny on forensic reporting practices, there have been several efforts to introduce statistical thinking and probabilistic reasoning into forensic practice.

This webinar is on-demand and available immediately.

Algorithms in Forensic Science: Challenges, Considerations, and a Path Forward

Over the years, scientific and legal scholars have called for the implementation of algorithms (e.g., statistical methods) in forensic science to provide an empirical foundation to experts’ subjective conclusions.

This webinar is on-demand and available immediately.

Assessing Footwear Examiner Performance

There has recently been increased attention on the reliability and validity of methods used in the analysis of forensic evidence.

This webinar is on-demand and available immediately.

IRT for Forensics

In this webinar, Amanda Luby explored how Item Response Theory (IRT), a class of statistical methods used prominently in educational testing, can be used to measure participant proficiency in error rate studies.

This webinar is on-demand and available immediately.

Source Code on Trial

Over a decade has passed since The National Academy of Forensic Science’s report, Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward, called on the scientific community to examine the scientific foundations and limitations of various forensic disciplines.

This webinar is on-demand and available immediately.

Handwriting Analysis at CSAFE

Forensic handwriting analysis relies on the principle of individuality: no two writers produce identical writing, and given enough quality and quantity of writing, it is possible to infer whether two documents were written by the same person.

This webinar is on-demand and available immediately.

Treatment of Inconclusive Results in Error Rates of Firearm Studies

In the past decade, and in response to the recommendations set forth by the National Research Council Committee on Identifying the Needs of the Forensic Sciences Community [2009], scientists have conducted several black-box studies that attempt to estimate the error rates of firearm examiners.

This webinar is on-demand and available immediately.

Mock Juror Perceptions of Forensics

We will describe two recent experiments. In the first, we conducted two studies whether knowledge of an expert’s performance on blind proficiency testing affects trust in the expert witness, the evidence (fingerprint or bitemark), and verdicts.

This webinar is on-demand and available immediately.

Implementing Blind Proficiency Testing

Blind proficiency testing is a norm or requirement in many scientific fields. However, forensic laboratories primarily rely on open proficiency tests from vendors such as Collaborative Testing Services, Inc. or Forensic Assurance. In open proficiency tests, examiners know they are being tested, and the test targets a specific step in the evidence handling and analysis pipeline.

This webinar is on-demand and available immediately.

Identifying Digital Evidence from Android Devices via Static and Dynamic Analysis

The over 50 app stores across the world provides mobile phone users with access to 8 million apps, each with the potential to house important forensic evidence.

This webinar is on-demand and available immediately.